<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 50 Domain Registrars Ranked</title>
	<atom:link href="https://websitewaves.com/top-50-domain-registrars-ranked.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://websitewaves.com/top-50-domain-registrars-ranked.html</link>
	<description>Get Your Website on Higher Ground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 02:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>https://websitewaves.com/top-50-domain-registrars-ranked.html/comment-page-1#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitewaves.com/?p=41#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite registar is NameCheap.com. I am actually surprised not to see them on the list there. They did just move from being an enom seller to their own system which could be why.

Ranking the top 50 domain registars based on their traffic does not seem to be a fair comparison of &quot;top registars&quot;.

I think the ranking system should be: price, support, features, user interface.
Price: This day an age domains shouldn&#039;t be over $10.00/yr. Some companies still do this and it works for them. Network Solutions did up until a short while ago.
Support: Support is always highly regarded when ranking any type of service. Thus itâ€™s a given on my list.
Features: As you say, URL forwarding is a nice feature to have. I also like having DNS being run from the registar on some sites. Features, features, features.
Last but certainly not least, User Interface. This relates back to your post on &quot;How Polite is Your Website?&quot;. I have come across some registars who have terrible user interfaces and make it hard to find what you are looking for. Or word it in a way that makes you over look it. From my standpoint if you do not have a good user interface I would use your service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite registar is NameCheap.com. I am actually surprised not to see them on the list there. They did just move from being an enom seller to their own system which could be why.</p>
<p>Ranking the top 50 domain registars based on their traffic does not seem to be a fair comparison of &#8220;top registars&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think the ranking system should be: price, support, features, user interface.<br />
Price: This day an age domains shouldn&#8217;t be over $10.00/yr. Some companies still do this and it works for them. Network Solutions did up until a short while ago.<br />
Support: Support is always highly regarded when ranking any type of service. Thus itâ€™s a given on my list.<br />
Features: As you say, URL forwarding is a nice feature to have. I also like having DNS being run from the registar on some sites. Features, features, features.<br />
Last but certainly not least, User Interface. This relates back to your post on &#8220;How Polite is Your Website?&#8221;. I have come across some registars who have terrible user interfaces and make it hard to find what you are looking for. Or word it in a way that makes you over look it. From my standpoint if you do not have a good user interface I would use your service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda Bedinghaus</title>
		<link>https://websitewaves.com/top-50-domain-registrars-ranked.html/comment-page-1#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wanda Bedinghaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitewaves.com/?p=41#comment-523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good blog. Thanks for the information.  You gave me the best at BestDomainName.com.  Their customer service has been great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good blog. Thanks for the information.  You gave me the best at BestDomainName.com.  Their customer service has been great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
